The UK’s fuel supply, the truth not rhetoric.

The energy price cap hike – the start of Labour’s problems?

UK energy sources.

Where does the UK’s fuel come from, apparently, it’s from foreign dictators according to Labour.  Kier Starmer “We will create a new publicly owned company – Great British Energy – to invest in homegrown clean energy across the country and give us real energy independence from foreign dictators.

Could someone please explain, who these dictators are? The information is available from DUKES (Digest of UK Energy Statistics). See https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/…/DUKES_2024…

DUKES - energy sources UKThe chart G3 above shows the UK’s ten largest markets in volume of imports and exports of coal and other solid fuels, primary oil, petroleum products, natural gas, electricity, and renewables. In 2023 Norway accounted for 32 per cent of total imports to the UK, followed by 24 per cent from the United States and 7 per cent from The Netherlands. For exports, The Netherlands accounted for 33 per cent of total exports from the UK, followed by 22 per cent to Belgium and 11 per cent to the Irish Republic. In March 2022, it was announced that the UK would phase out imports of Russian oil and oil products by the end of 2022 in response to Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine. Following that, in April 2022 it was further announced that the UK would phase out imports of Russian coal by the end of 2022, and imports of Russian LNG as soon as possible after the end of 2022. There was no trade for any fuel with Russia in 2023.

You may also consider reading https://www.ons.gov.uk/…/ukenergyhowmuchwhat…/2016-08-15

All EU countries now import more energy than they export

All EU countries imported more energy than they exported in 2014. In terms of rankings, of the 28 EU countries the UK was the 12th most dependent on foreign sources of energy; less reliant than Germany and Italy but more reliant than Sweden and the Netherlands.

Furthermore, in 2014 the UK’s import dependency was below the EU average and the UK was the least dependent on foreign sources of energy out of the five EU countries who consumed the largest amounts of energy overall (namely Germany, France, Italy, Spain and the UK).

However, even though the UK’s reliance on imported energy is still below its EU neighbours, the UK is now more in line with them than it has been in recent history.

Since 1998 the UK has gone from being a net exporter to a net importer of energy while Germany, Spain, France and Italy have all consistently imported more energy than they exported.

Import dependency in the EU: percentage of energy supply made up of net imports for the EU’s five biggest energy consumers and the EU average, 1998 to 2014

The Energy price cap hike – more problems for Labour.

As far as the economy goes, Sir Keir Starmer has enjoyed something of a golden honeymoon a small gain in the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) allowed the Bank of England to reduce interest rates earlier this month. Everything looked rosy, until early last week (W/C 19th August 2024).

Ofgem announced that the energy price cap will rise in October by 9%, adding an average of £149 to annual bills. While a rise was expected, this is a substantial rise at a time when inflation seemed to be back under control.

Energy price cap 2024

The 9% increase will not take energy bills to the dizzying heights of late 2022 and early 2023, but they do represent a big political issue for the government, following the removal of the winter fuel allowance, by Rachel Reeves, affecting all pensioners except those on pension credit. This follows a 15% pay rise to train drivers, a group who are already in the top 10 per cent of earners.

There’s a growing feeling that the Labour government is robbing pensioners to reward its union paymasters. Trade unions were indulged by Labour governments in the late 70s, since then memberships have declined, and there’s a risk that the majority of workers will again conclude that Starmer’s government is not on their side.

Banana skin.

The government’s biggest potential banana skin is its energy policy. Ed Miliband has promised to fully decarbonise the electricity grid by 2030. This target will cost billions in investment and which many in the industry believe cannot be achieved at any price.

It will require more wind turbines and solar panels and huge investment in energy storage. If government doesn’t invest in the energy storage, and there are no signs of that happening now, then consumers will face hard to swallow hike in pricing when wind and solar energy is sparse. It also means that the UK will become ever more dependent on electricity imported via subsea cables, from which we are currently drawing around a tenth of our power. That, too, will feed into spikes in electricity prices as we will need to import power at times when European countries are also low in renewable energy. If it’s not windy or sunny down south, that’s likely to affect northern Europe too.

Nuclear power and Carbon Capture Storage.

There is no chance of building extra nuclear power by 2030. In fact, we will lose nuclear from the grid as Hinckley C; when it eventually opens, will not compensate for the closure of other nuclear plants in coming years. The other option for decarbonising the grid, which Labour seemed to be leaning to in its manifesto, is to keep gas power stations but to equip them with carbon capture and storage (CCS). The cost BILLIONS! We don’t yet have a single large scale CCS plant in Britain, even a demonstration one. Let’s not forget that CCS leads to a substantial loss of efficiency, requiring more gas to output the same power.

A policy of continuing to rely on gas is at odds with Miliband’s explanation for Ofgem’s price cap rise. Bizarrely, this morning Miliband has blamed it on the Conservatives for making us dependent on ‘gas markets controlled by dictators’. Most of our imported gas currently comes from Norway, with the US and Denmark our next biggest suppliers. I await a forthcoming diplomatic incident.

Blaming the Tories for everything has been Labour’s default position since it took power seven weeks ago. That’s not likely to wash once the bills start to roll in for Miliband’s decarbonisation plans.

Ofwat sets out record £88 billion upgrade to deliver cleaner rivers and seas, and better services for customers.

  • Investment of £10bn to tackle storm overflows with a target to reduce spills from storm overflows by 44% from levels in 2021
  • Customer bills proposed to increase on average by £19 a year over the next five years – a third less than the bill increase requested by companies
  • New initiative to ring fence investment funding with a claw back guarantee which will ensure money not spent on investment is returned to customers
  • Companies to double support available for customers in need of a helping hand

Ofwat has today proposed allowing a spending package of £88bn by water companies.

£35bn of the expenditure reflects the investment needed to reduce pollution, improve customer service, river and bathing water quality, and deliver greater resilience to the impact of climate change. This is more than a trebling of the level of investment in the 2020 to 2025 period.

The total expenditure proposed is £16bn lower than in companies’ business plans. This reflects Ofwat’s analysis of those plans, removing or reducing costs where expenditure is insufficiently justified, inefficient or for activity for which companies have already been funded; customers will not pay twice.

The average bill increase for water and wastewater companies will be £19 a year over five years (£94 in total), excluding inflation. Companies’ business plans proposed increases averaging £144 over five years. Ofwat’s interventions have reduced the level of bill increases proposed by companies. For example, Thames Water’s proposed increase of £191 by 2030 has been reduced to £99; Severn Trent’s proposed increase of £144 has been reduced to £93.

Companies have been required to prepare for the future by setting their plans in the context of a 25-year delivery strategy. These proposals include the work of the regulators’ joint team RAPID, which is helping to accelerate the delivery of £17bn of new water assets including 6 reservoirs, some of which are part of the wider programme of major projects; in total 9 new reservoirs are proposed.

Water and wastewater companies – average bills for 2024-25 and 2029-30

Water and wastewater companies
2024-25 (£)
2029-30 (£)
Change, 2029-30 vs 2024-25 (£)
Anglian Water
491
557
+66
Dŵr Cymru
466
603
+137
Hafren Dyfrdwy
396
524
+128
Northumbrian Water
415
460
+45
Severn Trent Water
403
496
+93
Southern Water
420
603
+183
South West Water
497
561
+64
Thames Water
436
535
+99
United Utilities
442
536
+94
Wessex Water
508
497
-12
Yorkshire Water
430
537
+107
Water and wastewater companies – average
441
535
+94

Continue reading…


General Data Protection Regulation

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.